Compare applicant-to-screen and screen-to-submit rates.
High-volume channels may need tighter screening
Job boards can deliver reach, but recruiters need fast filters to avoid spending hours on weak-fit applicants.
Use a source performance report to compare candidate channels by quality, interview movement, placement value, and recruiter time spent.
Source overview
A channel that creates many candidates can still waste recruiter time if those candidates rarely screen, interview, or accept offers.
Measure each source by movement through the hiring process.
Separate inbound applicants, referrals, database rediscovery, job boards, social sourcing, and direct outreach.
Review sources by role family and market because channels perform differently across desks.
Use source notes to improve future search strategy.
Key findings
These findings help recruiters decide where to invest effort.
Compare applicant-to-screen and screen-to-submit rates.
Job boards can deliver reach, but recruiters need fast filters to avoid spending hours on weak-fit applicants.
Track rediscovered candidates and referral conversion.
Referrals, talent pools, and previous candidates can reduce trust-building time and speed up screening.
Measure positive reply rate and qualified conversation rate.
Outreach volume alone does not show whether the message or target list is working.
Review top sources by role family and placement type.
Specialist, executive, and high-volume roles need different channel mixes.
Source signals
These signals show when sourcing effort should shift.
The job ad may be too broad or the channel may not match the role.
Rewrite job requirements and add screening questions.
Candidates may appear qualified but miss client-specific requirements.
Update the source brief with rejected-candidate patterns.
The target list or message may not match candidate motivations.
Test a sharper value proposition and title variations.
Existing talent pools may be underused.
Schedule rediscovery workflows before buying new traffic.
Benchmarks
These benchmarks help recruiters compare channels fairly.
Action plan
Use the report to decide which channels to scale, pause, or refine.
Before sourcing
Define must-have criteria and adjacent titles.
List target companies and excluded companies.
Decide which sources fit the role difficulty.
During sourcing
Review first 25-50 profiles by channel.
Record rejection patterns.
Adjust search terms and outreach angles.
After shortlist
Compare source-to-interview movement.
Save high-performing source notes.
Update talent pools for future searches.
ATZ CRM workflow
ATZ CRM helps recruiters connect source data to candidate stages, outreach, submissions, and placements.
Keep source and candidate records usable for future searches.
Build cleaner sourcing strings for direct search.
Review sourcing steps before launching a search.
Plan target companies, title variations, and outreach angles.
FAQ
Use these answers to brief recruiters, managers, and clients before reviewing the full report.
It compares sourcing channels by candidate quality, process movement, cost, and recruiter effort so teams know where to focus.
Volume can hide weak quality. A channel is useful when candidates move into screens, interviews, offers, or placements.
Review early results during active searches and run a deeper source review monthly by desk or role family.