Client interview feedback
Ask every interviewer to score the same criteria after a client interview.
This template is built for recruitment agencies that need consistent feedback from clients and interview panels without losing the reason behind each score.
Recruiter use case
Top scorecard content explains why structured ratings reduce bias and improve comparison. ATZ CRM adds agency context: how feedback gets requested, captured, compared, and used to move candidates through the pipeline.
When to use it
Users want a scorecard they can copy and adapt for structured interviews.
What it should help capture
Use clear definitions so different interviewers score consistently.
5 - Exceeds role requirements with strong evidence
4 - Meets requirements with minor gaps
3 - Partially meets requirements; needs follow-up
2 - Significant gap against requirement
1 - Does not meet requirement
Adapt competencies to the role instead of using generic traits.
Role knowledge: score [1-5], evidence [notes]
Relevant experience: score [1-5], evidence [notes]
Communication and stakeholder fit: score [1-5], evidence [notes]
Problem solving or technical depth: score [1-5], evidence [notes]
Motivation and availability: score [1-5], evidence [notes]
Overall recommendation: strong yes, yes, hold, no
Use cases
Each template is positioned around a real recruiting moment, so the copy supports a specific candidate, client, or desk workflow.
Ask every interviewer to score the same criteria after a client interview.
Rate candidate fit before deciding whether to submit to the client.
Compare multiple candidates or interviewers using a consistent rating scale.
Included sections
These sections help recruiters capture the information needed to move the workflow forward without leaving important details in notes or email threads.
Defines what the interviewer is evaluating.
Pro tip
Use role-specific competencies from the job order, not generic personality labels.
Explains why a score was given.
Pro tip
Require at least one evidence note for every score below 3 or above 4.
Turns ratings into a hiring action.
Pro tip
Separate "hold" from "no" so recruiters know whether follow-up can unblock the decision.
Recruiter workflow
The template is designed to sit inside a broader operating workflow, with a clear action before, during, and after use.
Use the job order and client intake notes to choose competencies before interviews start.
How ATZ CRM supports this step
Job Management stores requirements and role context for recruiter and client review.
Explore related capabilityAsk interviewers to score candidates quickly after the conversation.
How ATZ CRM supports this step
Client Portal helps agencies centralize feedback instead of chasing email replies.
Explore related capabilityUse scorecard outcomes to advance, hold, reject, or request follow-up interviews.
How ATZ CRM supports this step
The ATS pipeline keeps interview decisions connected to candidate stages.
Explore related capabilityCommon mistakes
A 4 from one interviewer may mean something different to another.
Scores without notes create weak client feedback and poor candidate communication.
Long scorecards reduce completion rates. Focus on the criteria that decide the role.
ATZ CRM workflow
ATZ CRM helps agencies request, capture, and act on structured feedback so interview outcomes move the hiring process forward.
Related resources
Use these related pages when the template needs to connect into a wider recruiting workflow, tool, or product capability.
FAQ
An interview scorecard is a structured evaluation form that scores candidates against predefined criteria and captures evidence for each rating.
Include candidate details, role, interview stage, competencies, rating scale, evidence notes, risks, recommendation, and next step.
Most scorecards work best with five to seven competencies. Too many fields can reduce interviewer completion quality.