The expanded reports help you move from a headline number to a specific recruitment question. They complement the existing reporting suite rather than replacing every report with one dashboard.
Open and Filter a Report
- Open Reports.
- Choose a report below.
- Select the filters available for that report.
- Apply the filters and review the summary alongside the detailed rows.
- Use the export control where available if you need a copy of the permitted results.
Find the Right Report
| Report | Use it to answer |
|---|---|
| Candidate source performance | Which sources contributed new candidates, recorded stage movements, and placements during the period? |
| Pipeline conversion | How many candidate-job applications entered each selected stage during the period? |
| Job fill health | Which jobs created in the period have low coverage, a long age, or unfilled headcount? |
| User performance | What activity and recruitment work is attributed to a selected user? |
| Executive hiring health | Where do hiring, job coverage, and pipeline signals suggest a closer review? |
| Revenue forecast & collections | What placement billing remains unpaid, and how does it break down by due date and currency? |
| Recruiting funnel quality | How do source and funnel indicators compare across recorded recruitment activity? |
| Recruitment activity trend | How are candidate, job, and application additions changing over time? |
| Temporary operations | How well are shifts covered, and what bookings, completions, or no-shows need attention? |
Interpret Source and Stage Comparisons
Candidate source performance combines additions and stage events recorded during the chosen dates. A candidate added earlier may generate a stage event or placement during this period.
As a result, source ratios are period indicators, not a guarantee of what happened to one fixed group of newly sourced candidates. A source quality score is a reporting indicator, not a candidate suitability rating.
Pipeline conversion counts applications entering stages. A candidate assigned to two jobs can contribute two applications. A later stage can have more entries than an earlier one during the same dates because applications may have entered the earlier stage before the period began.
Use these comparisons to investigate bottlenecks, not to assume that every displayed percentage tracks the same people through an uninterrupted sequence.
Understand Job and User Figures
For Job fill health, the date filter selects jobs created during the period; coverage and fill information describe those jobs’ current position. Include the relevant job statuses when reviewing open work.
For User performance, distinguish work recorded during the period from current ownership totals. Reassigning a record is not the same as creating another record.
Team-filtered historical activity follows the membership relevant to the activity, while current record access still limits what you can see.
Reconcile with Home
Matching report and widget measures use the same reporting definitions. Compare their dates, teams, archive choices, and other settings. A detailed report may show more rows than a dashboard widget.
Do not expect a historical stage-entry report to equal a current-stage distribution, or placement billing to equal shift invoicing.
For help with a persistent mismatch, provide the two report names, selected filters, and the exact figures you compared. Your administrator can then check access and configuration without changing data unnecessarily.
FAQs
Are Goals, Competitions, and AI Insights in the Reports list?
No. Open their separate pages from Home or from the Account card in Admin Settings.
Can a conversion percentage be higher than 100%?
A period-based stage comparison can exceed 100% when different applications enter different stages during the period. It is not always a conversion rate for one fixed group of candidates.